sharui787 wrote:If u are a regular visitor, soon u will realise the great work done by MFM. unfortunately, that is as far as it can get. A good map. without a navi software partner like garmin, igo, papa go etc the Map is totally useless. With the recent events, it is clear with a software partners does not necessary bring the right results. Papa go is a clear case
where 1 vendor actually monopoly the map for its papa go software. it applies to other software too.
Others softwares vendors are either not interested or protective of their propriety compiler. We can't blame them, after all, compiler is indeed top secret technology. Worse, they have little to gain in revenue. Maps are a renewal revenue!!. Nice.
There are others like Garmin now are creating new barriers so that free MFM map cannot be generated with
more features. They may render the existing compilers useless by changing the structure completely. Once
that is done. MFM is back to square one. cool Maps with no users.
Thank you for identifying MFM's potential threat. I have always been worried about it. That's why the Papago project was important to us. The outcome may not be the most ideal. But it is far from a total failure. The most positive step forward is actually to engage more navigation software companies in similar projects. Then our eggs will not be in one or two baskets.
Even in the event that Garmin make MFM map unusable, plenty of members are still using older Garmin devices and software. When it is time for them to upgrade, it is up to them to choose map over software or the other way round.
sharui787 wrote:With the increase demand and awareness of GPS, other commercial map maker is hot on the trails of updating their maps. rumours has it that TA singapore is busy scouting malaysia with a fleet of mapping SUVs as we speak. Their latest beta version seem to be comparable with MFM if not better, afterall, they have the resources to do it day and night if there is a demand. This will be a direct threat to MFM. ie. MFM map with no software to run on!! Software provider can generate good revenue from maps. MFM can never be a good partner. what about Papa go? it is a partner of convenience. (like cSL and OTK in MCA Then for how long?
"Their latest beta version seem to be comparable with MFM if not better" - this analysis seems the be too simplistic without the evaluation of a larger test group. Don't forget that TA map has to be much more better than MFM to justify their price tag. And when that day finally comes, does MFM "
gulung tikar"?
Unlikely, for going out there tracking or mapping in front of our PC is our hobby. MFM can still serve a meaningful role that is to keep other map data supplier on their toes and make sure they do not slack. This role will still benefit our members and the general public. Furthermore, the fact s also that the community map is always with the community and we don't raise price
Btw, a partnership between a non-profit entity with a profit-seeking entity if it is not a partnership of convenience then what do you think it should be?
sharui787 wrote:Moving forward, the only long term solutions to develop its very own navigation software. Yes, to fast track
the development, MFM can raise funds from users or its member and tap into the power of open source, it can
be done.
MFM can review its model and may be charging a small fees like RM20.00 per copy downloaded etc. or free,
whatever.
With this new model: MFM control its own destiny and its future can be guaranteed.
Having our own navigation software will be my biggest dream come true. But it is a dream, at least for now. Even if your idea is feasible, it lacked implementation details seriously.
- Projection of income? How many RM20 can we earn? Have you checked how many will pay? As far as I am concern, it is a figure plucked from the sky
- Budget projection for software development? How much is needed?
- Time needed?
- Technology needed?
- Project management?
- Future upgrades?
If MFM is soon losing out to "competitors" even in the area where our core strength is, how do you expect our own software to compete against the competition? Just take a look at Mapking's difficulty in bringing their Mapking Virtual to market acceptance.
Of course, it will be a completely different story if you are an open source software developer and has the necessary knowledge to develop a decent navigation software. We can talk business straight away

jararaca wrote:Argh....
Sooner or later, 4 sure the map company will catch up if there is a market. I doubt anyone wanna to bet on
that.
They can be europe No.1. malaysia or singapore should be peanut. it may not be a perfect one like MFM, but one which is usable will be equally good.
I wouldnt be surprise if they started locking out MFM or any others free maps once they have a viable map. just a matter not how, but when? They are here for business ma...i would that done that too myself.
The question is, will MFM survive? The market is evolving quickly. MFM can be in a denies mode. no lah no lah...etc etc. it is a great success story but may have a tragic end. If you are a great supporter of Palm pilot...the leader of all leaders in PDA, should learn it that i might be going into receivership in the next few weeks.
I think bro shark has missed the forest for the tree. MFM is definitely not competing with other for maps solutions. But others try to stop MFM from generating free maps. Free maps are bad for business. for now if Garmin and papago did a major upgrade with their compilers and providing their own maps. Then how? I concurred with sharui that doing nothings or remain a status quo is not an options. I see it negatively without owning a navigation software. Make if Free software and maps is secondary.
I am not in denial, bro. I have a lot of hopes and thoughts. But I know better the strengths and limitations of this community too. If we can go forward or if someone can help us move forward, I would be the very happy indeed

My conclusion is that our current and future situation is not as dire as predicted by our two bros. However, being able to develop our own navigation software is indeed the best way forward. But we still need a lot of studies, fact findings and budgeting before even starting. In this area, I need external help
