MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Moderators: tympg, Moderators, Regional Mappers

chinwy
Regional Mapper
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2008 4:04 pm
Location: Kuantan, Pahang

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby chinwy » Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:08 pm

I would recommend 0x0a -> University be reclassified as "place of education" that will cover the land area and leave building in the plot as 0x13. That will cut down too many subclassifications ie schools, collages, university and then private ...

I also do the same for rural polyclinics and medical facilities land area as 0x0b.

That I find easy for remembering by colours instead of trying to remember what the various colours refer to. #-o

The only issue that will arise for all this consolidation is should we need in the future to have a detail breakdown - then it will need sorting out now, but can still be resolved by using the same colour only different polygon no asignment. That you can see now used in the default rivers and lakes polygons.

My 2 cts worth.

edchuang (retired)
Regional Mapper (retired)
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:37 am
Location: Shah Alam (GMXT+i-Blue747 Logger, Holux GPSmile62 Pro)

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby edchuang (retired) » Mon Nov 03, 2008 10:35 pm

1. Currently using 0x05 car park for badminton/basketball/etc court. Anyone using others skin? Quit worried later on need to do lots of editing if we all use different skin. :ko:
2. Some of the housing area already there physically but google map haven't updated yet, for this type of area, currently I plot the whole area with house skin. Acceptable? :-k

:tq:

User avatar
chrisean
Polygon Mapper
Posts: 37
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:07 pm
Location: PENANG GEORGETOWN

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby chrisean » Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:02 am

edchuang wrote:1. Currently using 0x05 car park for badminton/basketball/etc court. Anyone using others skin? Quit worried later on need to do lots of editing if we all use different skin. :ko:
2. Some of the housing area already there physically but google map haven't updated yet, for this type of area, currently I plot the whole area with house skin. Acceptable? :-k

:tq:



1. i'm also used 0x05 ... :D

2. i think can accept loh.. :mrgreen: because i'm draw the polygon at 'Kampung Area' also using this method.

edchuang (retired)
Regional Mapper (retired)
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:37 am
Location: Shah Alam (GMXT+i-Blue747 Logger, Holux GPSmile62 Pro)

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby edchuang (retired) » Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:46 am

chrisean wrote:1. i'm also used 0x05 ... :D

2. i think can accept loh.. :mrgreen: because i'm draw the polygon at 'Kampung Area' also using this method.

Great to know that our way of choosing polygon type is inline. So less worried for me now. Thanks Bro. :D

User avatar
tympg
Senior Mapper
Posts: 1579
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:01 am
Location: Penang

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby tympg » Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:15 am

Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.
Garmin nüvi 2575R; Garmin eTrex Vista HCx; Android 5.0.1 Phone

User avatar
WeiQi00
Polygon Mapper
Posts: 158
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:44 am
Location: Johor Bahru [60CSx + Nuvi 200w]

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby WeiQi00 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 2:33 am

tympg wrote:Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.


Note. Thanks :D
:thumbsup:Our maps are FREE but we need funds to keep this site going. Please support our HOSTING FUND =D> =D> =D>
Thanks for your support. :tq:

edchuang (retired)
Regional Mapper (retired)
Posts: 752
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2008 2:37 am
Location: Shah Alam (GMXT+i-Blue747 Logger, Holux GPSmile62 Pro)

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby edchuang (retired) » Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:24 am

tympg wrote:Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.

Well noted, so for the whole villages we use 0x0003 rural housing area and individual house inside the area we use 0x0010 right? Thanks.

User avatar
WeiQi00
Polygon Mapper
Posts: 158
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:44 am
Location: Johor Bahru [60CSx + Nuvi 200w]

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby WeiQi00 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:40 am

edchuang wrote:
tympg wrote:Please use rural housing area (0x3) for villages. I am using parking lot (0x5) for...car parks.

Well noted, so for the whole villages we use 0x0003 rural housing area and individual house inside the area we use 0x0010 right? Thanks.


I also think so. 0x03 for housing area, 0x10 for house. Thanks bro. :D
:thumbsup:Our maps are FREE but we need funds to keep this site going. Please support our HOSTING FUND =D> =D> =D>
Thanks for your support. :tq:

User avatar
sulphur
Valued Contributor
Posts: 201
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 2:16 pm

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby sulphur » Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:46 am

Any latest (updated) Polygon Reference Table?

TQ

User avatar
WeiQi00
Polygon Mapper
Posts: 158
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:44 am
Location: Johor Bahru [60CSx + Nuvi 200w]

Re: MFM Polygon Standardization Discussion

Postby WeiQi00 » Wed Nov 05, 2008 8:53 am

sulphur wrote:Any latest (updated) Polygon Reference Table?

TQ


Hi bro sulphur, :D Good morning
Latest Polygon reference table you can refer to MFM Mapping Reference v2.2
can get the excel file from here viewtopic.php?f=4&t=284
:thumbsup:Our maps are FREE but we need funds to keep this site going. Please support our HOSTING FUND =D> =D> =D>
Thanks for your support. :tq:


Return to “Mapping Guideline & Standards Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests