MFM Junction Vew

[chaicka]

Badrol u r brilliant.. and we also can put our name..

I think it's good if we can stick to a common icon-style watermark to be use for MFM JCV graphics/photos.
The position of the icon-style watermark should also be fixed across all MFM JCV graphics/photos. Eg. bottom left corner with a small spacing from the edge.

[fancheng]

After reading all these posts and with bro antoyng's PM, I have been thinking....

I do understand all the excitement and enthusiasm from all the members especially when we would be the first to cater junction views into our navigation units. And we know that there will 1001 different types of junctions as every junction is unique to its own in terms e.g. background. To do all of these one by one would take ages to complete and by that time, we will be left behind by our 'competitors'.

This is my opinions;

1. Come up with generic type of junction views (+ generic background) which can be used for any junction similar e.g.
a. single exit left from 3 lanes
b. single exit left from 2 lanes
c. double exit left from 3 lanes
d. double exit left from 2 lanes
e. single exit to flyover from 3 lanes
f. single exit to flyover from 2 lanes
g. double exit to flyover from 3 lanes
h. double exit to flyover from 2 lanes

This will save us lot of valuable family time and gas money. Not to mention size of each file.

2. Our 2nd phase, then only we would go for real life graphical images.

TQ

Great, I thinking same thing. Bro sulphur may you post a sample.

[edchuang (retired)]

After reading all these posts and with bro antoyng's PM, I have been thinking....

I do understand all the excitement and enthusiasm from all the members especially when we would be the first to cater junction views into our navigation units. And we know that there will 1001 different types of junctions as every junction is unique to its own in terms e.g. background. To do all of these one by one would take ages to complete and by that time, we will be left behind by our 'competitors'.

This is my opinions;

1. Come up with generic type of junction views (+ generic background) which can be used for any junction similar e.g.
a. single exit left from 3 lanes
b. single exit left from 2 lanes
c. double exit left from 3 lanes
d. double exit left from 2 lanes
e. single exit to flyover from 3 lanes
f. single exit to flyover from 2 lanes
g. double exit to flyover from 3 lanes
h. double exit to flyover from 2 lanes

This will save us lot of valuable family time and gas money. Not to mention size of each file.

2. Our 2nd phase, then only we would go for real life graphical images.

TQ

I suggest we do it in parallel. My opinion is even the phase 1 as mentioned would take months/years. Why not we do it in parallel? Majority with generic type, also a few with real life graphical images to start with.

[zuree]

i hope this MFM junction view project can be view and works on all nuvi 2xx/w series. not only 255w.

[jccy]

I personally like the hybrid. I guessed it'll be easier to clean up the photo to paint graphical roads and signboard which will also serve as good indication for junction view. Just my personal thought.

[vbnoob]

i hope this MFM junction view project can be view and works on all nuvi 2xx/w series. not only 255w.

and.....

Nokia 5800XM.

[johnTan]

Some junction photos taken on the way to/coming back from Seremban GG yesterday. No time to re-arrange and filter them.

Photo taken by Bro 76gpsguy.

http://s370.photobucket.com/albums/oo14 ... %20200409/

AND

[fauzee]

MFM Junction View VS MFM Junction Number View

[edchuang (retired)]

My first trial:

JVTest1-Before1.jpg

JVTest1-Before.jpg

Test1a.jpg

[fancheng]

My first trial:

JVTest1-Before1.jpg

JVTest1-Before.jpg

JV Test1.jpg

Very nice.